Something went wrong while setting issue due date.
FCOS Wording
Hi! Today I had a meeting with Tomas Diez and Lucas from FCF. In this meeting again the wording was confusing. Let me explain:
The Wireframes of Dyne (that focus on Design und Manufacturing and Shop, and which is internally defined as FCOS) immediately was commented in a way that Tomas said "... but this "Operating System" should be more. It should cover the full stack". We then explained that the "Software Kit" lies upon FCOS and has a wider approach off offering additional digital tooling.
In essence:
- If we could use FCOS for the whole "Operating system" with all its Parts, it would lead to less confusion IMHO.
- for internal work the current definitions (defined in the INTERFACER Glossary) kind of work right now. But for external communication I often see problems
I would recommend to have one Miro workshop lead by Rodrigo to tackle this wording problem.